Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 19(1): 2176083, 2023 12 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2239188

ABSTRACT

To address vaccine hesitancy, specific self-rated tools have been developed to assess vaccine literacy (VL) related to COVID-19, including additional variables, such as beliefs, behavior, and willingness to be vaccinated. To explore the recent literature a search was performed selecting articles published between January 2020 and October 2022: 26 papers were identified using these tools in the context of COVID-19. Descriptive analysis showed that the levels of VL observed in the studies were generally in agreement, with functional VL score often lower than the interactive-critical dimension, as if the latter was stimulated by the COVID-19-related infodemic. Factors associated with VL included vaccination status, age, educational level, and, possibly, gender. Effective communication based on VL when promoting vaccination is critical to sustaining immunization against COVID-19 and other communicable diseases. The VL scales developed to date have shown good consistency. However, further research is needed to improve these tools and develop new ones.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Humans , Literacy , COVID-19/prevention & control , Educational Status , Vaccination
2.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 33(10): 2899-2907, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1328681

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Policies to combat the COVID-19 pandemic have disrupted the screening, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of noncommunicable (NCD) patients while affecting NCD prevention and risk factor control. AIMS: To discuss how the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic affected the health management of NCD patients, identify which aspects should be carried forward into future NCD management, and propose collaborative efforts among public-private institutions to effectively shape NCD care models. METHODS: The NCD Partnership, a collaboration between Upjohn and the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing, held a virtual Advisory Board in July 2020 with multiple stakeholders; healthcare professionals (HCPs), policymakers, researchers, patient and informal carer advocacy groups, patient empowerment organizations, and industry experts. RESULTS: The Advisory Board identified barriers to NCD care during the COVID-19 pandemic in four areas: lack of NCD management guidelines; disruption to integrated care and shift from hospital-based NCD care to more community and primary level care; infodemics and a lack of reliable health information for patients and HCPs on how to manage NCDs; lack of availability, training, standardization, and regulation of digital health tools. CONCLUSIONS: Multistakeholder partnerships can promote swift changes to NCD prevention and patient care. Intra- and inter-communication between all stakeholders should be facilitated involving all players in the development of clinical guidelines and digital health tools, health and social care restructuring, and patient support in the short-, medium- and long-term future. A comprehensive response to NCDs should be delivered to improve patient outcomes by providing strategic, scientific, and economic support.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Noncommunicable Diseases , Caregivers , Humans , Noncommunicable Diseases/epidemiology , Noncommunicable Diseases/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 9(3)2021 Mar 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1138762

ABSTRACT

Rapid online surveys are an important tool for tracking the public's knowledge and perceptions during infectious disease outbreaks. In June 2020, during the early phases of COVID-19 vaccines development, we conducted a survey in 885 Italian adults that aimed at assessing their attitudes and opinions about vaccination, in addition to their vaccine literacy levels (i.e., skills in finding, understanding, and using information about vaccines). In January 2021, the same questionnaire was administered to a similar population (n = 160). Interactive vaccine literacy was significantly higher in January 2021 than in June 2020 (mean score 3.38 vs. 3.27 respectively, p = 0.0021). The percentage of participants willing to be vaccinated against COVID-19 assessed by either-or questions, was equally high in both surveys (>90%), which is quite reassuring, although metrics based on categorical scales cannot identify hesitant subjects.

4.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 17(5): 1304-1312, 2021 05 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-894517

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 infodemic can be countered by scientific evidence, clear and consistent communication, and improved health literacy of both individuals in need of information and those providing it. A rapid online survey was carried out to evaluate vaccine literacy (VL) skills in the general population and perceptions about COVID-19 vaccine candidates, along with behavior and beliefs about current vaccinations. Observed VL levels were consistent with previous observations - where comparable self-reported tools were administered face-to-face and by paper-and-pencil - the mean functional score being = 2.92, while the interactive-critical score was = 3.27, out of a maximum of 4. Perceptions regarding future COVID-19 vaccines, along with beliefs about vaccination, were mostly positive and significantly associated with functional and interactive-critical VL scales. Despite limitations, the study confirms that surveys via the web are a suitable method to evaluate and track attitudes during infectious disease outbreaks and assess health literacy skills about vaccination, which can be useful to adapt medical communication strategies, for a better understanding of the value of immunization.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Literacy/statistics & numerical data , Internet , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Young Adult
5.
Non-conventional in 0 | WHO COVID | ID: covidwho-704717

ABSTRACT

The lockdown period has certainly put a strain on our psychophysical health and for many it has represented a problem of functional efficiency of our body. In this document the Italian Sports Medicine Federation (FMSI) makes recommendations for the development and the performance of physical exercise sessions for the general population obliged to stay at home, due to the lockdown caused by the Coronavirus pandemics. Such recommendations are made in terms of intensity, frequency, volume and exercise modality, applying what has already been suggested by the Federation itself in the recent Italian Prescription Guidelines for Physical Activity for Healthy Adults. The proposed reconditioning program suggests the respect of a gradual return to physical activity, starting from at least 30-45 minutes every day up to a total of 150-300 minutes per week, combined with muscle strengthening and flexibility exercises. The intensity of the work must vary according to the individual's physical conditions and age, recommending activities of moderate intensity for most of the week, with a part of the individual sessions carried out at a higher intensity. If the period of isolation led to an increase in body weight, a return to normal weight is absolutely recommended, combining the returning to an active lifestyle with a controlled diet, moderately low in calories and rich in vitamins and with attention to appropriate hydration. Furthermore, an evaluation by a sports medicine specialist may be useful for a correct classification of health conditions and actual physical possibilities, especially for those with chronic diseases' risk factors or people over 50 years of age. For people who have been suffering from Covid-19, after the approval of the infectious disease specialist, but before returning to any kind of physical activity, an evaluation by the specialist is certainly advisable.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL